Build (round 4, snapshot10e): 10/10 pass.
a1: all 3 plans set server.path; report.url matched each page (/menu.html, /contact.html, /gallery.html); 3/3 verify pass; npm test 17/17; cost matches exactly.
a4/a7/j1: report.url matched the intended page; BrowserVerify did not mislead.
Notes: refused (schema-invalid) calls give tool-result frames with no tool-use frame (by design, queryEngine.ts:1505); a5 seed broken by harness printf backticks (harness); a7 plan.ts does not say text/value/visible selectors must match one element (doc gap, not defect); j7 ran haiku/high (by runner config). All costs match usageTotals.
