{
 "model": "claude-haiku-5-5",
 "category": "edit",
 "scenarios": [
  {
   "id": "b1-inventory-fix",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Fixed the 4 bugs in inventory.js and the summary formatting in report.js, and added exportCsv with tests. I ran npm test myself: 10/10 pass. The seeded test file is unchanged. The failing-test rerun loop worked: 5 failing, then 4 passing, then all passing.",
   "notes": "Exit 0, .err empty, no leftovers. 1 turn-complete. All 11 tool_use calls are paired in the log and in contextMessages, all complete. The FileEdit/FileWrite baselines for inventory.js and report.js are byte-identical to seeds/edit-existing. The new report.test.js has an absent baseline. Snapshot sha256 values check out, and the last outputs frame equals the saved outputs. Cost recomputed from usageTotals = $0.004778765, which matches result.json. Cache read 95,899 over 6 requests. The tool list has 31 tools, including TeamMemoryWrite and Skill, with the 6-line skill catalog and no MCP or DeferredToolCall. The npm test verification was recorded in learned/patterns.json."
  },
  {
   "id": "b2-inventory-approvals",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "All 5 tests pass (I ran npm test). Only src/ was changed, and the tests are byte-identical to the seed.",
   "notes": "5 approvals, one for each non-read call (3 Bash, 2 FileEdit). Each has its own requestId, each was followed straight away by its tool-use and a successful result, none hung and none was asked twice. FileRead was never asked. The baselines equal the seed bytes. Cost matches ($0.00316896). Pairing is OK and there is 1 turn-complete."
  },
  {
   "id": "b3-inventory-deny",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "The only call, a read-only Bash ls/cat, was denied. Nothing ran, and the project is byte-identical to the seed (diff -rq is clean; the tests still fail 5/5, as seeded). Turn 2 explained the denial accurately in two sentences.",
   "notes": "The toolHistory state is \"denied\", and the tool_result reads \"Not run: the user declined approval for this Bash call, so nothing was executed or changed...\". By design the result frame has no tool-use frame, and the saved session pairs it. There was no retry and no workaround through another tool. Both turns ended with turn-complete. There is no outputs entry, which is correct because nothing would have been written. Cost matches ($0.001067325)."
  },
  {
   "id": "b4-js-to-ts",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Converted the library to strict TypeScript. mean([]) throws a RangeError, and tsx + node:test tests were added. I ran npx tsc --noEmit (exit 0) and npm test (5/5 pass).",
   "notes": "The rename was done with Bash mv. In the Changes data, src/math.js and src/stats.js are marked deleted:true with their original 97-byte baselines intact, and the .ts files are new entries with an absent baseline and 2 versions (Bash, then FileWrite). package.json has a 33-byte baseline and 2 versions. npm install worked. There were 2 FileWrite failures, \"exists but has not been read with FileRead yet\", because the model overwrote the files after mv without a FileRead. The guard is in call() (FileWriteTool.ts:66-71), so state \"failed\" matches the code. The message is accurate. The model recovered by reading and rewriting, and the failure guard did not fire. No duplicate outputs. Cost matches ($0.00774111)."
  },
  {
   "id": "b5-python-lib",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "cart.py is fixed: qty is used in total, and the percent discount has bounds. I ran python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -t . : 3 tests OK. tests/test_cart.py is byte-identical to the seed.",
   "notes": "The model also added an empty tests/__init__.py. It is a new test-package file, not an edit to the tests, but strictly speaking it is a change under tests/. The cart.py baseline is the original 118 bytes. Cost matches ($0.00297381). The unittest command was recorded as a learned verification pattern."
  },
  {
   "id": "b6-rename-across-files",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "getUserName was renamed to getDisplayName in user.js and all 15 modules. grep finds 0 old references. I imported all 15 modules myself and each returns \"Hi A B\", and the model's check-imports.mjs reports 16/16 OK.",
   "notes": "The 16 FileEdit outputs entries plus check-imports.mjs each have a correct baseline (64/95/96 bytes) and 1 version, with no duplicate paths. All 21 tool calls are complete and paired. Cost matches ($0.00442023)."
  },
  {
   "id": "b7-notebook",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "sales.ipynb now has 4 cells: the original markdown and code cells unchanged, a new code cell at index 2 (mean/max print), and a markdown explanation at index 3. It is valid JSON, nbformat 4.5. NotebookEdit was used for the insert, insert, and in-place replace of the markdown cell.",
   "notes": "NotebookEdit gave the existing cells ids, which nbformat 4.5 needs. The model pip-installed nbformat into the run environment and ran nbformat.validate, which passed. I could not import nbformat under python -I, so I checked the structure by hand. The notebook has 1 outputs entry with a 242-byte baseline (the original) and 3 versions; the current file equals the last version. Cost matches ($0.00295339)."
  },
  {
   "id": "b8-large-file-edit",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "One FileEdit with 5 edits: fn100, fn1500 and fn2999 now multiply, a JSDoc block sits above fn0, and fn42 is deleted. My diff against a regenerated original shows only those changes. Importing big.js gives fn100(3)=300, fn1500(2)=3000, fn2999(2)=5998, fn42 absent, and 2999 exports. The model's verify script passes 11/11.",
   "notes": "The big.js baseline equals the exact original 3000-line file (170,780 bytes). The model inspected the file with Bash grep/head and never used FileRead pagination. FileEdit does not require a prior read; it only checks staleness (FileEditTool.ts:348), so that is by design. The model also copied big.js to /tmp, outside the project, which bypass mode allows. Cost matches ($0.00444697)."
  },
  {
   "id": "j3-refactor-legacy",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "The three largest components (Subjects.tsx 19,270 B, Contact.tsx 16,584 B, Home.tsx 14,478 B) were split into 22 new files in the same folders. I bundled the seed and the refactor with esbuild 0.28.2. After normalizing esbuild's numeric suffixes, the JSX bodies are identical; the only differences are the extracted wrapper functions and props (RoleField/LotsField/InquirySuccess/ContactDetails/FaqSection), so behaviour is kept. The model also SSR-rendered 20 illustration cases: old and new are identical.",
   "notes": "j3 hit 0 tool failures: all 22 calls complete, 0 failed and 0 refused, so the failure guard never fired. The exact esbuild command in the task exits 1 on both the seed and the refactor, because bare imports such as react-router-dom and lucide-react are not externalized or installed. That is a fixture/environment matter; the model showed the original fails the same way and verified with extra --external flags (exit 0). Baselines for the 3 edited files equal the seed. 26 outputs entries, no duplicates, and the last frame equals the saved outputs. 1 request went over the 100K long-prompt threshold. The long-prompt cost recompute = $0.05716883, which matches. The model wrote scratch copies and installed react under /tmp. There are no learned patterns because esbuild is not in the VERIFY regex, which is consistent with the code."
  },
  {
   "id": "j4-docs-from-code",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Wrote docs/<name>.md for all 11 engine/*.ts files, plus docs/README.md linking all 11. My regex check finds every exported symbol of each file named in its doc. engine/ is unchanged from the seed.",
   "notes": "31 tool calls, all complete and paired: 12 FileRead and 12 FileWrite, plus Glob/Grep/ListDir/Bash. 12 outputs entries, all new files with an absent baseline, no duplicates. No old-result clearing was needed. Cost matches ($0.023775525), cache-read ratio 0.86."
  },
  {
   "id": "j5-git-project",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Fixed inventory.js and report.js, showed git diff --stat (2 files, +5/-4), and committed c80ec8e with a clear multi-line message on top of init 46bb674. The working tree is clean, the tests are untouched, and I ran npm test: 5/5 pass.",
   "notes": "The baselines for both edited files equal the seed and equal git show HEAD~1 (the init commit), so Changes agrees with git. The commit author comes from the machine's global git identity. Cost matches ($0.00407723). The npm test verification was recorded in learned/patterns.json."
  }
 ]
}