{
 "model": "claude-haiku-5-5",
 "category": "edit",
 "scenarios": [
  {
   "id": "b1-inventory-fix",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Bugs fixed and exportCsv added with tests. I ran `node --test`: 10/10 pass, and test/inventory.test.js matches the seed.",
   "notes": "Exit 0, 1 turn, turn-complete, 11/11 tool pairs, all states complete. Baselines for src/inventory.js and src/report.js byte-match the seed; test/report.test.js has an absent baseline. Failing-test rerun loop worked. No duplicate outputs and the last version matches disk. Learned pattern `npm test` has runs 3, successes 0, which is correct: every call was followed by `;` or `| tail`, so its status is unknown. Cost recompute diff 0, cache ratio 0.882, leftovers empty, driver.err empty."
  },
  {
   "id": "b2-inventory-approvals",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "5 failing tests fixed in src only. I ran `node --test`: 5/5 pass, tests unchanged.",
   "notes": "5 approvals (3 Bash, 2 FileEdit), each with a unique requestId and followed by tool-use then a result. None hung and none was asked twice. FileRead needed no approval. Both baselines byte-match the seed. 8/8 pairs, cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.878, leftovers empty."
  },
  {
   "id": "b3-inventory-deny",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "The single Bash call was denied and did not run; the project is byte-identical to the seed (diff -r). Turn 2 answered accurately in two sentences.",
   "notes": "Tool-state is `denied` with error 'You declined this Bash call. Nothing was run.'. The model-facing result reads 'Not run: the user declined approval...'. Not re-asked and no retry through another tool. No tool-use frame, as designed; the saved session pairs the call. No home/.npm exists, which confirms npm never ran. Outputs empty. 2 turn-completes, cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.954."
  },
  {
   "id": "b4-js-to-ts",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Converted to strict TS with an empty-array RangeError. I ran local tsc --noEmit (exit 0) and `node --import tsx --test`: 5/5 pass.",
   "notes": "2 failed FileWrites on src/math.ts and src/stats.ts: the model had created them with `mv`, then wrote without FileRead. The error is correct, the state is `failed` because the call ran, and the model re-read and succeeded. Changes: math.js and stats.js marked deleted with baselines byte-equal to the seed; .ts files have absent baselines; package.json baseline is the seed; package-lock recorded; node_modules not listed. The last outputs frame equals the saved list. 19/19 pairs, cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.949."
  },
  {
   "id": "b5-python-lib",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "shop/cart.py fixed. I ran the unittest discover command: 3 tests OK, and test_cart.py is byte-identical to the seed text.",
   "notes": "The model added an empty tests/__init__.py, recorded with an absent baseline; its choice, and no test was edited. The cart.py baseline equals the seed. 9/9 pairs, cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.945, leftovers empty."
  },
  {
   "id": "b6-rename-across-files",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Renamed everywhere: 0 references to the old name and 16 files carry the new one. check-imports.mjs passes, and my own import of all 15 modules returned the expected string.",
   "notes": "Changes has 17 entries (16 edited plus the script), no duplicates, and all 16 baselines equal the original text. One failed Bash: BSD sed does not support \\b, so the first sed changed nothing and the compound command exited 1. It is reported as `failed` with the output and 'Exit code: 1', and the model corrected it. Scenario config lists medium effort, but the run used High per the brief. Cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.923."
  },
  {
   "id": "b7-notebook",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Two NotebookEdit inserts put a code cell at index 2 and a markdown cell at index 3. I parsed the file: valid JSON, nbformat 4.5, 4 cells in the right order, code cells have execution_count and outputs.",
   "notes": "Baseline holds the original 2-cell notebook (242 bytes); versions show 3 then 4 cells; last version matches disk. nbformat is not installed locally, so I did not run its validator myself. The model's own nbformat.validate in a temporary venv passed, per its log, and it deleted the venv. Cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.957."
  },
  {
   "id": "b8-large-file-edit",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "My line diff against the regenerated seed shows only what was asked: JSDoc above fn0, fn42 removed, fn100/fn1500/fn2999 multiply. Import test: fn100(3)=300, fn1500(2)=3000, fn2999(2)=5998, fn42 undefined, 2999 exports.",
   "notes": "Baseline equals the original 3000-line file (170780 bytes); versions 170825 then 170867. The first edit went through a Bash node script and was still recorded. One failed FileWrite to /tmp/verify-big.mjs: that file is stale, dated Nov 3 from an earlier gate, and the 'exists but has not been read' guard correctly protected it. The model read it and reused the old script; environment and model choice, and my checks are independent of it. The model also left /tmp/big.js.orig. Cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.895."
  },
  {
   "id": "j3-refactor-legacy",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Split InquiryForm, LotArt and HeroLandscape into sibling files. With local esbuild 0.28.2 and --packages=external, new and seed both bundle (exit 0). I rebuilt and reran the model's render comparison: 129/129 identical.",
   "notes": "Failures: 1 of 62 calls, so the failure guard did not fire. It was a FileEdit on Subjects.tsx after the model's own `sed -i`; 'modified externally since last read' is correct, the state is `failed` because call() ran the staleness check (FileEditTool.ts:350-354), and the model re-read and succeeded. None refused; no BrowserPlan call this time. The user's exact esbuild command fails before and after, only on unresolved bare packages because the project has no node_modules; the same 9 package names fail on both sides, and the model reported this honestly. Seed has no tests. Changes: 13 entries, no duplicates, 5 pre-existing baselines byte-equal the seed, 8 new files absent, version count matches writes.jsonl (15), Subjects' Bash and FileEdit versions both kept, last versions match disk, and every file differing from the seed is listed. 62/62 pairs, turn-complete, no reply-restart, no context-full. Cost $0.445715 recomputes exactly (33 long-prompt requests), cache ratio 0.968. The model left /tmp/r19-* scratch folders outside the project and outside Changes; not a listener or process leak. Result leftovers empty."
  },
  {
   "id": "j4-docs-from-code",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "docs/ has 11 pages plus README. All exported function and class names my regex found appear in their page, README links resolve, and engine/ is identical to the seed.",
   "notes": "Changes: 12 entries, all absent baselines, compact.md has 2 versions (FileWrite then FileEdit), no duplicates. No failures across 29 calls. The model noticed a partial read of queryEngine.ts and read the rest. Its stated total of 27 exports differs from my regex count of 31 functions and classes, a model counting matter; no name is missing. Scenario config lists medium effort, but the run used High per the brief. Cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.817, leftovers empty."
  },
  {
   "id": "j5-git-project",
   "status": "pass",
   "product_defects": [],
   "task_outcome": "Tests fixed (my `node --test`: 5/5), `git diff --stat` shown (2 files, +5/-4), one fix commit 2c8e45e on top of init. Working tree clean, git fsck silent, tests untouched.",
   "notes": "Baselines equal the seed, and their hashes equal `git show HEAD~1:` for src/inventory.js; report.js also equals the seed committed as init. One failed Bash: `npm test | grep ...; git config user.name; git config user.email` exits 1 because no identity is set, so `failed` is correct. The model committed with a one-time `-c` placeholder identity and said so. Learned pattern `npm test` has runs 2, successes 0, matching the recordable commands; the `find ... && npm test` call is correctly not recorded. Cost diff 0, cache ratio 0.938, leftovers empty."
  }
 ]
}